Science & Archaeologynamesnahomhebraismslinguistics

Book of Mormon Names and Linguistics

Are Book of Mormon names just Joseph Smith’s made-up Bible fan fiction, or do they fit ancient Semitic and Egyptian patterns he could not have known?

Bible

The Bible answers

Bible · Isaiah 29:4

KJV + NRSVUE

King James Version
And thou shalt be brought down, and shalt speak out of the ground, and thy speech shall be low out of the dust, and thy voice shall be, as of one that hath a familiar spirit, out of the ground, and thy speech shall whisper out of the dust.

NRSVUE
Then deep from the earth you shall speak; from low in the dust your words shall come; your voice shall come from the ground like the voice of a ghost, and your speech shall whisper out of the dust.

Bible · Isaiah 28:11

KJV + NRSVUE

King James Version
For with stammering lips and another tongue will he speak to this people.

NRSVUE
Truly, with stammering lip and with another tongue he will speak to this people,

Book of Mormon

The Book of Mormon answers

1 Nephi 16:34
And it came to pass that Ishmael died, and was buried in the place which was called Nahom.

1 Nephi 1:2
Yea, I make a record in the language of my father, which consists of the learning of the Jews and the language of the Egyptians.

Ancient witnesses

Dead Sea Scrolls and related extra-biblical texts that illuminate the same pattern the Restoration restores.

South Arabian NHM and Semitic onomastics

Altars from Yemen bear the tribal name NHM in the right region and the right era for Ishmael’s burial as Lehi’s party turned east. Alma appears as a male Jewish name in the Bar Kokhba documents (Alma ben Yehudah). Paanchi and Pahoran fit Egyptian patterns; Sariah is a plausible feminine of YHWH-names.

Joseph Smith did not have a South Arabian inscriptional corpus, a modern Egyptian grammar, or the Bar Kokhba letters. A lucky hit can happen once. The pattern of hits is the argument.

Faithful answers

Scripture Central

Scripture Central KnoWhys

Scripture Central

The old-world map of 1 Nephi—Valley of Lemuel, Nahom, Bountiful eastward—has grown sharper with every decade of Arabian research. Hebraisms, colophons, and extended chiasmus (Alma 36) were not parlor tricks of 1829 frontier fiction. They were noticed later, which is how authentic accidents behave.

Nahom is a proper name already in the land, not a name Nephi invents. That is exactly how an itinerary through someone else’s country should read—and it sits on the map.

“The place which was called Nahom” (not “which we called”) is the grammar of an existing toponym. NHM is there.
Reformed Egyptian (Mormon 9:32–33) matches a culture that already wrote Hebrew in Egyptian script in Lehi’s century.
Chiasmus in Alma 36 is long, name-centered, and thematically tight. It was identified in 1967, not marketed in 1830.
Critics must now claim Joseph was a secret genius of Semitic philology who never cashed the check. That theory has its own faith commitments.

Read the original

Keep going

Rate this answer

Be the first to tell us if this case is strong.