Book of Mormon
Book of Mormonanachronismshorsessteeltranslation

Horses, Steel, Wheat, and Other Anachronisms

Don’t horses, steel, and wheat prove the Book of Mormon is modern?

Bible

The Bible answers

Bible · Job 39:19

KJV + NRSVUE

King James Version

Hast thou given the horse strength? hast thou clothed his neck with thunder?

NRSVUE

Do you give the horse its might? Do you clothe its neck with mane?

Book of Mormon

The Book of Mormon answers

1 Nephi 18:25

And it came to pass that we did find upon the land of promise, as we journeyed in the wilderness, that there were beasts in the forests of every kind, both the cow and the ox, and the ass and the horse, and the goat and the wild goat.

Faithful answers

FAIR

Book of Mormon anachronisms

FAIR Latter-day Saints

Anachronism arguments assume (1) we have a complete faunal and botanical record and (2) English words in a revealed translation must map one-to-one onto Linnaean species. Neither is true. Cement, barley, and large urban sites were once 'anachronisms' and then were found. Remaining issues are best read as translation choices or incomplete data — not as a gotcha.

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, especially for animals whose bones do not survive well in Mesoamerican soils.

  • Joseph translated into King James vocabulary, not scientific taxonomy.
  • Several former anachronisms (cement, barley, large cities) have archaeological counterparts.
  • Loan-shift is normal when a culture meets a new animal or crop.
Read the original

Further reading

Keep going

Rate this answer

Be the first to tell us if this case is strong.